The Battle of the Bonds
A long shot down the barrel of a gun. Trumpets blaring out a lively melody. Scantily clad women gyrating about. It can only mean one thing: Bond. James Bond. The Bond franchise has grossed more than any other movie series save Harry Potter (that’s saying a lot taking in to account Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, and the ever popular “Ernest” films). What’s made this suave spy so popular over almost five decades? And how has Bond avoided contracting every known STD after sleeping with women from every continent many times over? The latter only science can tell. But his popularity? Let’s talk.
James Bond derives his coolness from one source in my mind; anonymity. Who are Bond’s parents? Who are his siblings? Does he like to watch spy movies when not invovled in international capers? Wikipedia sports a long checklist of Bond facts but the truth of the matter is, the films have stayed mostly clear from giving the protagonist any real depth as an actual human being. This is not a bad thing. If Bond, for instance, had a lifelong struggle to impress a demanding father, do you really think we’d want to watch movie after movie of this drawn out emotional conflict? Not a chance. We want to be thrown into the action and become part of Bond’s mystique for an hour or two and then go back to life without having to wonder if James will make alimony this month or whether or not his Grandma will pull out of pnuemonia. He’s wonderfully two demensional. And we like him that way.
I know in Ian Flemmings’ novels he gives Bond a bit more pathos. I love reading these books to get a little deeper sense of who this shag-happy spy really is. But when it comes to the big screen I want action and I want it now. No “issues” please.
In closing I think the main point at hand has to be this; Moore or Connery. I know there have been other, very well suited Bonds over the years (Pierce Brosnan is dreamy), but for classic “Bond-ness” who wins? I’m a Roger Moore girl myself. He has a sense of regal cunning about him that I love to watch. Sean Connery is charming, but a but too nypho for my taste, if you get what I mean. What think ye? This is an important issue.
Much more, do I dare say, than black or woman…being as that seems to be the only real issue in another current, shall we say “national caper”. (talk about pork-barreling a blog entry!)

February 29th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you.
Tom Stanley
March 1st, 2008 at 9:23 am
Connery, the true bond will always be Sean Connery.
March 2nd, 2008 at 7:46 pm
connery hello! he was sexy when he was yonger and he is sexy now even for an old dude!
March 3rd, 2008 at 12:59 am
Quackin right! Roger is da man! Hes a smooth machine, could take connery out with his shoe. He did all the golden years of Bond, post realism, pre realism. Graphic comic character, one cool duck.
We watched Spidy3 last night. I thought one of the best of the series. They really can capture that comic book style.Loved the bit with bruce Cambell as the French Maitre De. Ramies man from Evil dead series.Also had time this week to watch American Gangster ,excellent movie did you see it yet? Mabey a good blog subject?
I wont be seeing as many movies since we fly north soon , mabey a stop or two but you know how the pressure to keep up with the quackin flock is.
We went fri night and saw Vantage Point: fun but hokey!
Is it ok to comment on other movies besides the one discussed?I’m new to bloggin.
So I dodn’t want to ruffle Robs feathers.
Long Live the Ducky Revolution!!!